A court decision annulling deer would lead about half of the states to make abortion illegal immediately or shortly after the Supreme Court acts. The decision is the culmination of a decades-long Republican project, but could also highlight the party’s resistance to efforts to help parents.
“I think that has to be an important part of the discussion,” Sen. Mike Rounds (RS.D.) said in an interview. “It’s not just about saying, ‘We’re pro-life.’ So it’s about promoting and enabling those people who are making very difficult decisions in their lives to make sure that we can help people who are facing those difficult decisions.
Collins and Murkowski put on the defensive after Roe project leak
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) said he had “preliminary” conversations with other Senate Republicans about introducing children’s programs after the Supreme Court ruling: “I think if the court finally cancels deerit will be a big political shift, and I think there will be all kinds of new opportunities to think about what this means for us from a political perspective, and hopefully we will come up with some interesting new political insights.
“We are of course waiting for the decision to be finalized, but yes,” said Sen. Todd C. Young (R-Ind.). “As a party and as a country, we must support women who have unplanned pregnancies – through adoption services, health services and other means.”
For months before the Supreme Court’s decision, conservative policymakers had debated whether the party could support a more modest expansion of family benefits than proposals backed by Democrats or the White House should. deer be canceled, according to three conservative political pundits, who spoke on condition of anonymity to reflect private conversations. These talks brought no change to the party’s position. Only Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) supported a major expansion of the child tax credit to nonworking parents. Biden’s one-year credit expansion expired late last year amid nearly uniform GOP opposition, leading to an approximately 41% increase in child poverty.
Democrats say Republican opposition to child benefits only underscores the recklessness of efforts to roll back abortion protections, arguing that the GOP wants to both force mothers to have children and then deprive them of children. material support for raising children. Democrats have long been skeptical that the Republican talk of child policy is anything more than a political stunt designed to distract conservative opposition from economic benefits for families.
“Not only do [Republicans] want to force women to have children if they are pregnant, but when they do, they don’t want to support them,” said Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii). “That’s what Republicans do all the time.”
Several Senate Republicans on Tuesday declined to say whether the decision changes their stance on child benefit programs, saying it was too early to intervene. But the party has long been split between social conservatives, more open to aid, and free-market conservatives who have staunchly resisted such efforts.
“Are they proposing a family policy to counter this decision, or are they going back to their message on inflation, the economy and Afghanistan? asked Doug Holtz-Eakin, former economic adviser to President George W. Bush and John McCain. “It’s been a battle within the conservative ranks for a while…But the GOP is going to have a big decision to make.”
On Tuesday, Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) said he opposed efforts to create programs that would reward nonworking parents, reiterating traditional GOP concerns about expanding parental benefits. Sen. Patrick J. Toomey (R-Pa.), another free-market conservative, said he hadn’t considered the idea of expanded support for child benefits. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) said Republicans would seek to “enact policies that make it easier for families to raise children,” predicting a slew of new measures to be introduced, but also suggested the GOP would oppose new spending measures.
“There’s still support in the Republican conference for tax cuts; there is always support for the Democratic conference to spend more and more money,” Cruz said.
But while the exact ramifications of the ruling remained unclear — especially less than a day after it was released, and with a final notice yet to come — some of the GOP’s traditional opposition to family benefits may be waning.
Already, blocs of congressional Republicans have begun to examine various forms of family support policy. A dozen Senate Republicans have backed legislation allowing pregnant women to access the Child Tax Credit, which is currently only given to parents with children, while Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) has a separate proposal to give a new payment of $3,600. for those who miscarry. Sen. Cynthia M. Lummis (R-Wyo.) also pointed to bipartisan legislation that allows parents to receive the child tax credit up front to help pay for parental leave. Romney has tried to offer his colleagues a compromise to relaunch the child tax credit at a level lower than that approved by the Biden administration last year.
All of these efforts should receive renewed attention following the Supreme Court’s decision.
“There’s going to be a lot of pressure on Republicans to see what they can do for young kids,” said Sam Hammond, a policy expert at the Niskanen Center, a right-wing think tank, which works closely with several Senate GOP offices. “Leading, usually skeptical, Senate Republicans have shown renewed interest in policies to help parents with the cost of children.”
Child poverty rose 41% in January after Biden benefit package expired, study finds
To date, conservatives have opposed supplementary family benefits in a world where federal access to abortion, at least in theory, gave pregnant women the choice of whether or not to carry a pregnancy to term. If termination is no longer an option, some conservatives say it could strengthen the case for financial support for parents.
“I could see if Republicans decide that abortion policy is working against them, there could be push for child care benefits, more maternal health care and better adoption services to make more easier and more affordable for more mothers to carry babies to term,” said Brian Riedl, a conservative policy expert at the Manhattan Institute, a right-wing think tank. “It would put their money where their mouth is when they are challenged to make it easier for mothers to pay their children and get their health care.”
Democrats remain skeptical of the GOP’s efforts. The United States is already one of the stingiest countries in the developed world when it comes to providing parental support: it spends less money as a percentage of its gross domestic product than almost any other country in the world. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development for family benefits. , according to OECD data.
“All of these conservative Republicans seem to be making big talk about ‘family values,'” Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) said. “When they’re done with their speeches, when it comes to putting it into substantive, concrete legislative ideas – there’s no there, there.”